Quantcast
Channel: Comments on A ‘Great’ Rebuttal Of Female Privilege, Part III (Conclusion)
Browsing all 40 articles
Browse latest View live

By: TmTherion

“There is a legitimate argument that in the prevailing legal climate, the deck is so stacked against fathers that the only ones who do seek sole custody are those who have extraordinarily good cases,...

View Article



By: ballgame

(I will also note that the Huffington Post article fails to mention that there are over seven times as many mothers unemployed/working part time as fathers, and when both parents work full time, the...

View Article

By: desipis

the key to arguing against female privilege is to ignore actual outcomes, and to focus instead on occasionally-dubious theories about how a female privilege arose. This is by far the most common theme...

View Article

By: Aapje

Moreover, it has only been in the last year or two that the National Organization of Women revoked its official stance against shared custody initiatives. Can you provide evidence for this? I’ve only...

View Article

By: ballgame

I’m not sure what, exactly, you’re asking for evidence for, Aapje. Up until recently, NOW had some sort of document on their website opposing shared custody initiatives (I’m not sure if it was this or...

View Article


By: ballgame

I appreciate your thoughts, desipis, but I don’t agree with the ‘everybody’s wrong’ implication of this: And like inkblots, we all see what we want to see. Either the proposition that “Men are...

View Article

By: OirishM

I personally wouldn’t call quietly removing a previously-made statement a “revocation”, but that might just be me. Or at least not in this arena. How many times has material politically inconvenient to...

View Article

By: Daran

I agree with OirishM. Merely removing a document from your website does not revoke a policy. To revoke a conference resolution would take nothing less than another conference resolution.

View Article


By: ballgame

Point taken.

View Article


By: desipis

ballgame, I agree with your point that my last sentence was a bit defeatist. I had to rush to finish that comment and rather overstated the point I was trying to make. It was meant to be more along the...

View Article

By: desipis

Also, I’m not sure you can really have a complete discussion on female privilege without mentioning the empathy gap.

View Article

By: Aapje

Point taken. So will you change your blog post? At the very least, I would suggest replacing ‘revoked’ with something more factual, like: ‘NOW are not currently campaigning against shared custody.’ As...

View Article

By: Daran

Or that people mistake a lack of benevolent sexism from men to women for hostile sexism: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf Interesting paper, the main finding of...

View Article


By: Areos

Aapje (assuming you are the same one as on Ampersand’s website): I really liked your posts on “Alas a Blog”. You were polite and factual, and you got banned because of content – they can’t argue...

View Article

By: ballgame

So will you change your blog post? At the very least, I would suggest replacing ‘revoked’ with something more factual, like: ‘NOW are not currently campaigning against shared custody.’ As it is, I...

View Article


By: Aapje

@Daran This study examined the subjects’ prejudices, but not their experiences as beneficiaries/victims of the prejudices of others. If men and women both suffer from it, doesn’t that mean that by...

View Article

By: Schala

“I don’t have a blog yet, but you can find me on reddit’s FeMRADebates for now.” I got banned from there something in the middle of last year. For something pretty tame and upvoted.

View Article


By: Aapje

I got into trouble with the mods recently there. You have to be really careful about not generalizing, even when from context it should be clear that you don’t mean all feminists.

View Article

By: John Anderson

It’s my understanding that the Massachusetts study was based on appellate court decisions. That would be a very important distinction since the lower court rulings were 2 to 1 in favor of the mother....

View Article

By: Ginkgo

“It’s my understanding that the Massachusetts study was based on appellate court decisions. That would be a very important distinction since the lower court rulings were 2 to 1 in favor of the mother.”...

View Article
Browsing all 40 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images